Basic bricks of our reality are abstract objects in array instead material particles in vacuum.
The introduction in object oriented approach in description of
physics is offered. The idea is that vacuum and gravitational;
electromagnetic fields are extra entities in physics. Presented
object oriented approach postulates existence of array of object
these behave according functions these are laws of physics.
When learning physics in high school and later in university
the process of absorbing waste amount of facts and most time
consuming methods to solve specific problems takes all energy
and almost none spared for childish curiosity. The amount of
new information is so enormous that simple naïve questions
are missing in action. Modern physics since quantum mechanics
adopts the motto: “shut up and calculate”. Divorce between philosophy
and physics is not visible for anyone as soon there was no such
thing. It was bloody murder. Physics killed philosophy and buried
the body in dust library shelves.
What is proof of the truth? How one can be convinced that physics
gives right answers about electricity for example? The person
can switch on light in home every time he wants. Before physics
discover laws of electricity he cannot, after can. Numerous helpful
toys used by millions customers are ultimate proof that physics
produces right answers. The problem is that the more products
come from physics the less clear the answers for questions starting
with words “What is …?”.
What is the matter? Most useless and in the same time the only
definition in agreement with modern science is that matter is
everything around and inside us. If one limited as was before
modern times the definition of matter to area in space that has
weight he will omit photons as massless particles. So the matter
is everything now.
What is particle? Particle is small object. That is it. Nice.
What is the wave? It is oscillations of mater (?) or something
medium that also can be vacuum for photons these are electromagnetic
waves. Medium is matter because everything is, but without mass.
Sort of nothing with properties.
What is the vacuum? Sort of nothing but filled up with waves
of different sort and also virtual particles up to the most of
its neck. Virtual particles are by the way sort of exist by no
quite always looking outside their rabbit hole. Joke.
Are you confused? I was until lately enlightenment that concept
of objects oriented software is exact instrument for describing
phenomena of physics.
Let’s illustrate object oriented approach for describing simple
example of several electrons and protons in vacuum at any arbitrary
distances in between but located far enough from each others
not to form atoms. In canonical description given in physics
these particles create all around each of them an electromagnetic
field that exists in any point of space. The vectors of this
field can be calculated for positions of each of these particles
and corresponding forces will define their farther trajectories.
In object oriented approach each object (electron or proton)
participates in calculation of accelerating vectors of the other
objects according laws of electromagnetism. The results of calculations
for both methods will be identical because exact the same formulas
will be applied. The only and principal difference will be the
absence of the electromagnetic field in object oriented approach.
Vacuum and fields in it do not exist. (Remember: there is no spoon in Matrix).
There is no electromagnetic field. It is just abstraction used
to illustrate strange phenomena of electricity in related to
human experience terms. But what about photons? Photons are vibrations
of electromagnetic field so it must be real. Right? Not necessary.
Photons have dual nature (all other particles in physics too).
Until they are on their own all what can be known about them
that with given probabilities they can be located in practically
in any point of space. Formulas to calculate these probabilities
constructed as if photons are wave of electromagnetic field.
When photon is interact with other particle this wave instantly
implodes in the point of interaction. Strange isn’t it?
I object oriented approach there is no implosion of the electromagnetic
wave into one localized point. The definition of photon here
is an object that behaves according formulas describing vibrations
of electromagnetic field. The difference between waves in existing
electromagnetic field and formulas of waves in electromagnetic
field is the key for resolution of paradox dualistics wave-particle
behavior of the photon. It is the objects with properties of
particle and formulas of behavior of wave. Why? Software developer
of virtual reality that is our world knows better. Shut up and calculate
So what the point? If all formulas remain the same, results of
calculation are identical as well what the excuse to brake Occam's
razor rule and introducing extra entity in theory? Really if
you think it is quite opposite. In object oriented approach the
extra entities are taking out. There are no vacuum, no gravitational,
electromagnetic, strong and weak fields. There are only objects
these behave according to rules of physics we know from experiments.
These rules are essentially analogs of functions in software.
This software is our reality. Virtual reality.
Oct. 26, 2018; 10:07 EST